Naval Staff History No. 41, the official historical study of the evacuation from Dunkirk during Operation Dynamo, 26 May–4 June 1940, dated 1949.
Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 234/360. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
1 matching pages. OCR may contain transcription errors.
| Page | Image | OCR text | OCR tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| 76 |
|
CHAP. VI |
Albury
Anthony
Calcutta
Canterbury
Chantecler
Cruiser
Duchess
Duchess of Fife
England
Fitzroy
Formidable
Golden Lily
Hebe
Intrepid
Ivanhoe
Javelin
Johanna
Jutland
Killarney
King George
Lily
Maid of Orleans
Manxman
Prague
Royal Daffodil
Royal Sovereign
Sabre
Scotia
Sharpshooter
TSS Scotia
Tynwald
Verity
Wolsey
Day
George
King
Malcolm
May
|
Unformatted machine-generated OCR for document page 76.
CHAP. VI THE EVACUATION FROM DUNKIRK Ramsgate at 2200/29. situated over the engine. capable of 4 knots, also and left Dutch eel-boats Johanna The Chantecler was only M.B. Golden Lily The and returned to harbour; and the remainder Chantecler reached and the La Panne at 0500/30. and brought back lost troops. her in the Downs in the get over on May, and round"¹. She 30 The Johanna did not on the 30th and compass which was reached the beaches, however, revolved at 0900 slowly round her Ramsgate on the morning on that day she was towed she had no charts, of way the 30th May. Later darkness, and returned to to the beaches by the skoot Jutland. Troops transported on 29th May reduction in the number of destroyers and with failure to The 29th May closed with a formidable available list of ships lost or damaged, a marked the high rate of evacuation hoped for. The effect of the day's occurrences achieve even more marked next day, when instead of the 50,000 to 60,000 British was were in fact transported.² troops which had been calculated as the probable achievement, only 48,000 odd Nevertheless, 47,310 troops (including some 2,000 casualties) were landed in England on the 29th May (see Table 2), 13,752 having been lifted from the beaches and 33,558 from the harbour. Only about 11/2 per cent of these were French troops³, whose organised evacuation had not yet begun. (See Appen- dices Y.2 to Y.5). During the morning and forenoon of the 29th May, when there was no bombing of Dunkirk harbour, 1Q personnel vessels⁴ lifted 14,760 troops from the east pier; during the afternoon, in spite of the bombing, the Canterbury lifted a further 1,960. The development of beach evacuation is indicated by the fact that nearly 2½ times the number of troops were lifted from the beaches on 29th May as compared with the number lifted on the previous day. Seventeen destroyers⁵ each made one round trip during the 24 hours of the 29th May and an eighteenth destroyer, the Icarus, made two such trips. On these trips the 18 destroyers embarked and transported to England 10,694 troops of which 6,198 were lifted from the beaches and 4,506 from Dunkirk harbour. Nine minesweepers6 together lifted 2,426 troops from the beaches although one of them, the Albury did not land her troops in England until the next day.⁷ Among other ships which brought back troops from the beaches was the cruiser Calcutta with 1,200. The record of troops landed in England now stood as follows :- From the From the Total for beaches harbour the day 26th May Nil Nil Nil 27th May Nil 7,669 7,669 28th May 5,930 11,874 17,804 29th May 13,752 33,558 47,310 I Report by Chantecler. 3 D.R., which incidentally puts the total of and casualties landed on 29th Table May 2). as 2 D.R. p.11, para. 38. 40,724. This figure probably does not include troops carried by foreign ships (See Prague, 4 The Côte d'Argent, Killarney, King George troops V, Maid of Orleans, Manxman, Royal Daffodil, Royal Sovereign, Scotia, and Javelin, Malcolm, Sabre, Scimitar, Verity, Wolsey and Worcester. Marmion 5 The Anthony, Codrington, Esk, Express, Tynwald. Greyhound, Harvester, Intrepid, Ivanhoe, 6 The Albury, Duchess of Fife, Emperor Shikari, of Vanquisher, India, Fitzroy, Halcyon, Hebe, Leda, and Sharpshooter. 7 See Table 3, in conjunction with the reports of ships' proceedings in Vol. II. 54