← Document collections
TNA / MT 40 66

TNA MT 40 66

TNA MT 40 66
Collection details

TNA MT 40 66

Ministry of Transport records containing a Dynamo vessel list and reports from masters and crews engaged in the evacuation, covering 1940–1947.

Holding archive
TNA
Collection reference
MT 40 66
View the archive catalogue entry ↗

Source: The National Archives, Kew, MT 40/66. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Showing only document page 10. Show all matching pages ×

1 matching pages. OCR may contain transcription errors.

List page 1 of 1 Showing document pages 10–10 of this collection
Page ImageOCR textOCR tags
10 Page 10 Log in to enlarge

84
WHITEHALL 2624.
Pass, Linnos,
(Dinistry of d'inberice,
Fisheries,
5,03.1
27th December, 1940.
Dear Edwards,
7th January, 1941.
We have received from our Inspector at Lowestoft a short note in the following terms:-
Dear Lowe,
"On I Saturday have your letter of the 27th December regarding the
Naval issue of letters from the Ministry of Shipping to vessels which served at Dunkirk.
Shipping in appreciation of their services
When at the operation was completed the Ministry had under consideration the issue of some form of recognition to vessels which had taken part in that operation. As you lnow, so far as the larger ships were concerned (including tugs) we have definite information as to which ships had been employed in the evacuation and what services they had rendered. As regards small craft, however, which would include fishing vessels, the position was absolutely chaotic. We knew that in but records were not available to show which of these 600 had something over 600 craft had been involved in the operation if over got beyond the assembly ports such as Sheerness, le Ramsgate and Dover, still less whether the personnel to rendered meritorious service. As you know, in many cases craft were manned by naval ratings after being delivered to the assembly ports by either their own or runner crews. For this reason the issue of the Minister's letter was limited to the cases I mention above. An regards smaller craft, the suggestion was mooted that some form of recognition either by way of a pla ue or a pennant and opinions favoured the former, but in view of the numbers involved and the shortage of metals and timber nothing further was done in the matter.
Ornlaw
In the meantime our records of small craft are being gradually clarified and if after the war some form of recognition is decided upon we may possibly be able to produce something approaching an accurate picture.
H. Bowards, Seq.,
Coa Department,
Yours sincerely, D.H.E.
Ministry of Chipping,
A.M. Lowe, Esquise,
Ber Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries,
(Dept.O.J.), 55, Whitehall, S.W.1.
FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING
DOVER.
25th October, 1940.

Raw OCR

Unformatted machine-generated OCR for document page 10.

84
WHITEHALL 2624.
Pass, Linnos,
(Dinistry of d'inberice,
Fisheries,
5,03.1
27th December, 1940.
Dear Edwards,
7th January, 1941.
We have received from our Inspector at Lowestoft a
short note in the following terms:-
Dear Lowe,
"On I Saturday have your letter of the 27th December regarding the
Naval issue of letters from the Ministry of Shipping to vessels
which served at Dunkirk.
Shipping in appreciation of their
services
When at the operation was completed the Ministry had under
consideration the issue of some form of recognition to vessels
which had taken part in that operation. As you lnow, so far
as the larger ships were concerned (including tugs) we have
definite information as to which ships had been employed in
the evacuation and what services they had rendered. As
regards small craft, however, which would include fishing
vessels, the position was absolutely chaotic. We knew that
in but records were not available to show which of these 600 had
something over 600 craft had been involved in the operation
if over got beyond the assembly ports such as Sheerness,
le Ramsgate and Dover, still less whether the personnel
to rendered meritorious service. As you know, in many cases
craft were manned by naval ratings after being delivered to
the assembly ports by either their own or runner crews. For
this reason the issue of the Minister's letter was limited to
the cases I mention above. An regards smaller craft, the
suggestion was mooted that some form of recognition either
by way of a pla ue or a pennant and opinions favoured the
former, but in view of the numbers involved and the
shortage of metals and timber nothing further was done in
the matter.
Ornlaw
In the meantime our records of small craft are being
gradually clarified and if after the war some form of
recognition is decided upon we may possibly be able to
produce something approaching an accurate picture.
H. Bowards, Seq.,
Coa Department,
Yours sincerely, D.H.E.
Ministry of Chipping,
A.M. Lowe, Esquise,
Ber Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries,
(Dept.O.J.), 55, Whitehall, S.W.1.
FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING
DOVER.
25th October, 1940.