TNA / MT 40 66

TNA MT 40 66

Collection details

TNA MT 40 66

Ministry of Transport records containing a Dynamo vessel list and reports from masters and crews engaged in the evacuation, covering 1940–1947.

Holding archive: TNA
Collection reference: MT 40 66

View the archive catalogue entry ↗

Source: The National Archives, Kew, MT 40/66. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Showing only document page 116. Show all matching pages ×

1 matching pages. OCR may contain transcription errors.

List page 1 of 1 Showing document pages 116–116 of this collection

A note about image and OCR quality

Every reasonable effort has been made to present these document images as flat, straight and accurately cropped as possible. Historical records can be difficult to photograph or scan because of tight bindings, deep gutters, page curvature, folds, creases, fragile paper, uneven edges, shadows, glare, skewed pages, fading, stains, tears, attachments and restrictions on how a document may be handled. These conditions can distort parts of an image and consequently affect the OCR transcription.

Considerable post-production work has been undertaken to crop, align, flatten and enhance the images where practicable, but the results represent our best effort rather than exact facsimiles. Text showing through from the reverse of a page, printed backgrounds, stamps, ruled lines, marks and text visible from neighbouring pages may confuse or spoil OCR output. Handwriting is not reliably recognised and, in most places, may be missing, incomplete or incorrectly transcribed. Always check the page image and, where accuracy matters, consult the original record held by the identified archive.

OCR is not a transcription. It is machine-generated text used to create research tags and help locate names and references within the source images; it should not be read as a verified narrative.

Page	Image	OCR text	OCR tags
116	Log in to enlarge	(z) We may never have a correct list of all the craft which 0" assisted in the evacuation, nor shall we ever know the worthiness or unworthiness of the part played by the companies of the ships whose names we do obtain. ion S, d We must risk that and err on the side of sending too many letters rather than too few, if we are to undertake the task at all. The question of the award of a plaque to the ships is well worth considering, but before coming to a decision on that we must consult other Departments concerned. there are other questions to he acided, such as meddlo, might DI have drafted a letter on the lines SH. on which the Minister write. to of 13th June 1940 (3) The Minister has agreed the draft letter as modified, and I will have copies roneoed for signature and despatch to the persons on the attached list, but I should be glad if first you would confirm that a letter should go to the "Spinel". If a letter does go it will have to be differently phrased in any case, but according to the footnote she was ordered to Dunkirk and took no part in the evacuation. It is not clear whether she ever got to Dunkirk. Did she run out of it, or was she sunk? The Mr. МИН Hynard. IV 14th June, 1940. inkeenlyside betiol this She was hanked heavily. was moved into the inco tasin. The bridge Spenil arrived at bunkink Nicharg some of her carry. abandmed, master and ware taken of of basin the was homes. the vessel was unable to leave. This maing so she was mm se unBellami 14/10 Please see Doc. 82 with reference to previous Mi regarding the proposal for Dunkirk plaque. The Press report might would indicate to the ordinary reader that this presentation was officially sponsored. (1502) 28899/1063 1,500,000 9/39 JC&SLtd Gp644'229 Mr. Glenfster. 8' 3rd December, 19 (REGIMINT) CODE 5-34-0 We need take no action on this. W Wornhom. at X of minute 16? Whateis the result of the enquiries mentioned hope	Spinel Bridge Few May

Raw OCR

Unformatted machine-generated OCR for document page 116.

(z)
We may never have a correct list of all the craft which
0"
assisted in the evacuation, nor shall we ever know the worthiness
or unworthiness of the part played by the companies of the ships
whose names we do obtain.
ion
S,
d
We must risk that and err on the side of sending too many
letters rather than too few, if we are to undertake the task at all.
The question of the award of a plaque to the ships is well
worth considering, but before coming to a decision on that we must
consult other Departments concerned. there are other questions to he
acided, such as meddlo,
might
DI have drafted a letter on the lines SH. on which the Minister
write.
to
of
13th June 1940
(3)
The Minister has agreed the draft letter as modified, and I will have
copies roneoed for signature and despatch to the persons on the attached
list, but I should be glad if first you would confirm that a letter should
go to the "Spinel". If a letter does go it will have to be differently
phrased in any case, but according to the footnote she was ordered to
Dunkirk and took no part in the evacuation. It is not clear whether she
ever got to Dunkirk. Did she run out of it, or was she sunk?
The
Mr. МИН Hynard.
IV
14th June, 1940.
inkeenlyside
betiol this She was hanked heavily . was moved into the inco tasin. The bridge
Spenil arrived at bunkink Nicharg some of her carry.
abandmed, master and ware taken of
of basin the was homes. the vessel was unable to leave. This maing so she was
mm
se
unBellami 14/10
Please see Doc. 82 with reference to previous Mi
regarding the proposal for Dunkirk plaque.
The Press report might would indicate to the ordinary
reader that this presentation was officially sponsored.
(1502) 28899/1063
1,500,000 9/39 JC&SLtd
Gp644'229
Mr. Glenfster.
8'
3rd December, 19
(REGIMINT)
CODE 5-34-0
We need take no action on this.
W Wornhom.
at X of minute 16?
Whateis the result of the enquiries mentioned hope