← Document collections
TNA / ADM 116 4649

TNA ADM 116 4649

TNA ADM 116 4649
Collection details

TNA ADM 116 4649

Operation Dynamo reports and recommendations for awards, volume 2 (1940–1942), documenting service during the Dunkirk evacuation and the cases submitted for official recognition.

Holding archive
TNA
Collection reference
ADM 116 4649
View the archive catalogue entry ↗

Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 116/4649. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Showing only document page 278. Show all matching pages ×

1 matching pages. OCR may contain transcription errors.

List page 1 of 1 Showing document pages 278–278 of this collection
Page ImageOCR textOCR tags
278 Page 278 Log in to enlarge

B23/159/41
ATE:-
OM:- SENIOR 12th February, OFFICER, 1941. HARWICH AUXILIARY PATROL, IPSWICH.
No. 1221/28
THE FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING, DOVER.
Report further in accordance to my 1187/28. with your B23/159/41 and
Flotilla, early which included there I found that Auxiliary Patrol
I in was June, appointed and on arrival in Command of the Harwich report, had already arrived. the vessels named in Lieutenant a portion Jordan's of my until observed I should join, and for this reason it M/S
On such arrival time as these ships had been taken over by Captain that Office. that Lieutenant Jordan's first report was rendered will to be ge but with the attached comment, was handed to me and I carried out
Immediately after my arrival, this first report, together thorough investigation, finally arriving at the conclusion reported a in my letter of June 9th. In this respect I must add that I
received an even more lurid verbal report from Lieutenant Jordan before he realised that I had been at Dunkirk for the period of the evacuation; but I assume that there is sufficient
.sh misrepresentation of fact in the two written reports to make is;
it unnecessary for me to go into details.
come
I would respectfully make the following comments in support of my refusal to believe a large proportion of these reports.
(a) A comparison of the two only goes to show that this
We
Officer's imagination improves with keeping.
hre en
(b) There are very few of the original crews of these ships now serving under my command, for which, in a large measure, I blame Lieutenant Jordan because he did not carry out my orders to explain the T.124 Articles to the men. This number has subsequently been reduced in the turn-over to R.N.P.S., but they are all of the opinion that they made only one passage to Dunkirk and ent er back, and that was at approximately noon on Saturday taken
June 1st, when the French troops were being Lock at the off.
111
I I or time, was the and in action the saw vicinity nothing taken as of of stated the the Train enemy by Lieutenant Ferry activity reported Jordan. in his
(c)
ILLINOIS
Harwich, recent had (if never this and can seen be I most or heard certainly of me ships had before nothing on his the night to do to Cewbison Officer with of the at the
1941
(a) May embarkation were report I to case. do the 30th. not performed disgust as doubt being I of strongly which troops for by a individuals case I in moment have always relt about his in that obtain these acts addition reports ships, of gallantry but the from adds whole first
4
on consider such an egoist it quite as this of ficer.
(e) If there is/

Raw OCR

Unformatted machine-generated OCR for document page 278.

B23/159/41
ATE :-
OM :- SENIOR 12th February, OFFICER, 1941. HARWICH AUXILIARY PATROL, IPSWICH.
No. 1221/28
THE FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING, DOVER.
Report further in accordance to my 1187/28. with your B23/159/41 and
Flotilla, early which included there I found that Auxiliary Patrol
I in was June, appointed and on arrival in Command of the Harwich
report, had already arrived. the vessels named in Lieutenant a portion Jordan's of my
until observed I should join, and for this reason it M/S
On such arrival time as these ships had been taken over by Captain
that Office. that Lieutenant Jordan's first report was rendered will to be
ge
but
with the attached comment, was handed to me and I carried out
Immediately after my arrival, this first report, together
thorough investigation, finally arriving at the conclusion reported a
in my letter of June 9th. In this respect I must add that I
received an even more lurid verbal report from Lieutenant Jordan
before he realised that I had been at Dunkirk for the period
of the evacuation; but I assume that there is sufficient
.sh
misrepresentation of fact in the two written reports to make
is;
it unnecessary for me to go into details.
come
I would respectfully make the following comments in support
of my refusal to believe a large proportion of these reports.
(a) A comparison of the two only goes to show that this
We
Officer's imagination improves with keeping.
hre
en
(b) There are very few of the original crews of these
ships now serving under my command, for which, in a large
measure, I blame Lieutenant Jordan because he did not
carry out my orders to explain the T.124 Articles to
the men. This number has subsequently been reduced
in the turn-over to R.N.P.S., but they are all of the
opinion that they made only one passage to Dunkirk and
ent
er
back, and that was at approximately noon on Saturday taken
June 1st, when the French troops were being Lock at the off.
111
I I or time, was the and in action the saw vicinity nothing taken as of of stated the the Train enemy by Lieutenant Ferry activity reported Jordan. in his
(c)
ILLINOIS
Harwich, recent had (if never this and can seen be I most or heard certainly of me ships had before nothing on his the night to do to Cewbison Officer with of the at the
1941
(a) May embarkation were report I to case. do the 30th. not performed disgust as doubt being I of strongly which troops for by a individuals case I in moment have always relt about his in that obtain these acts addition reports ships, of gallantry but the from adds whole first
4
on
consider such an egoist it quite as this of ficer.
(e) If there is/