Admiralty records concerning Operation Dynamo and the evacuation of troops from Dunkirk, covering 1940–1941.
Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 199/792. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
1 matching pages. OCR may contain transcription errors.
| Page | Image | OCR text | OCR tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| 96 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL. |
Unformatted machine-generated OCR for document page 96.
CONFIDENTIAL. Operation "DYNAMO" - Narrative of Events. Page 36 155 Inshore Flottllas and Naval Shore Parties (continued). 111. Locally, at oth Ramsgate and Dover a number of civi- lian volunteers came forward to man the boats and to drive their engines. These men did good work. 112. At both Ramsgate and Dover when the business of manning these civilian power boats was set about the same difficulties were experienced:- (i) of obtaining drivers with knowledge of the very varied types of internal combustion engines; (ii) of making the engines of these boats run, most of them having been laid up since the previous summer. Throughout the operation all engines continued to give trouble. Many engines were old and almost all were of different types. Several boats could not be used as they had diesel engines and no stokers or civilians trained in these were available. Each engine, especially the older ones, required careful nursing, and signs of distress from the engines were not understood. These difficulties were partly overcome by obtaining engine drivers from Chatham and by the provision of cadet ratings, and Sub-Lieutenants, R.N.V.R. from KING ALFRED who claimed knowledge of I.C. engines, but many engines were of types unknown even to these. These difficulties would never have arisen had the civilian crews, or even their drivers, been willing to take their boats across to Dunkirk. 113. Fresh water for the motor boats was difficult to supply in sufficien quantity, owing to lack of water tanks in most boats, especially those of the open type. Large supplies were required as the troops were reported to be suffering severely from thirst. Both at Ramsgate and Dover the Base Staff provided as many galvanized iron cylinders and tanks as could be found and made serviceable, and these proved most satisfactory, 114. On two occasions skoots and small boats approaching the coast were turned back through false information. On the first occasion on the afternoon of 28th May, at least 6 skoots, who were without definite orders where to proceed, encountered a returning skoot when about 10 miles off the coast. This skoot stated that Dunkirk had already fallen into German hands and that the evacuation had ceased. It is believed that this report originated from an Army officer embarked in the skoot. He had stated, consequent on the capitulation of Belgian troops that the Germans would be advancing along the coast that evening. As a result of this ill-judged comment, the arrival of at least 6 skoots was delayed at over 24 hours, until this situation had been clear- ed up. The second occasion occurred during the night of 1st June and has been referred to in paragraph 76 of the narrative. On this occasion although the services of a number of small craft were lost to the coast, it transpired that sufficient were already there to cope with the troops available. 115./