← Document collections
TNA / ADM 199 792

TNA ADM 199 792

TNA ADM 199 792
Collection details

TNA ADM 199 792

Admiralty records concerning Operation Dynamo and the evacuation of troops from Dunkirk, covering 1940–1941.

Holding archive
TNA
Collection reference
ADM 199 792
View the archive catalogue entry ↗

Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 199/792. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Showing only pages tagged with the vessel name Evening. Tags are exact matches from this collection’s OCR tag index. Clear vessel filter ×
Showing only document page 549. Show all matching pages ×

1 matching pages. OCR may contain transcription errors.

List page 1 of 1 Showing document pages 549–549 of this collection
Page ImageOCR textOCR tags
549 Page 549 Log in to enlarge

CONFIDENTIAL.
Page 36
Operation "DYNAMO" - Narrative of Events.
Inshore Flottllas and Naval Shore Parties (continued).
111. Locally, at both Ramsgate and Dover a number of civilian volunteers came forward to man the boats and to drive their engines. These men did good work.
112. At both Rams ate and Dover when the business of manning these civilian power boats was set about the same difficulties were experienced:-
(i) of obtaining drivers with knowledge of the very varied types of internal combustion engines;
(ii) of making the engines of these boats run, most of them having been laid up since the previous summer.
Throughout the operation all engines continued to give trouble. Many engines were old and almost all were of different types. Several boats could not be used as they had diesel engines and no stokers or civilians trained in these were available. Each engine, especially the older ones, required careful nursing, and signs of distress from the engines were not understood. These difficulties were partly overcome by obtaining engine drivers from Chatham and by the provision of cadet ratings, and Sub-Lieutenants, R.N.V.R.
from KING ALFRED who claimed knowledge of I.C. engines, but many engines were of types unknown even to these.
These difficulties would never have arisen had the civilian crews, or even their drivers, been willing to take their boats across to Dunkirk.
113. Fresh water for the motor boats was difficult to supply in sufficient quantity, owing to lack of water tanks in most boats, especially those of the open type. Large supplies were required as the troops were reported to be suffering severely om thirst, Both at Ramsgate and Dover the Base Staff prov..ed as many galvanized iron cylinders and tanks as could be found and made serviceable, and these proved most satisfactory.
114. On two occasions skoots and small boats approaching the coast were turned back through false information. On the first occasion on the afternoon of 28th May, at least 6
skoots, who were without definite orders where to proceed, encountered a returning shoot when about 10 miles off the coast. This skoot stated that Dunkirk had already fallen into
German hands and that the evacuation had ceased. It is believed that this report originated from an Army officer embarked in the skoot. He had stated, consequent on the capitulation of Belgian troops that the Germans would be advancing along the coast that evening. As a result of this ill-judged comment, the arrival of at least 6 shoots was delayed at over 24 hours, until this situation had been cleared up.
The second occasion occurred during the night of 1st
June and has been referred to in paragraph 76 of the narrative. On this occasion although the services of a number of small craft were lost to the coast, it transpired that sufficient were already there to cope with the troops available,
115./

Raw OCR

Unformatted machine-generated OCR for document page 549.

CONFIDENTIAL.
Page 36
Operation "DYNAMO" - Narrative of Events.
Inshore Flottllas and Naval Shore Parties (continued).
111. Locally, at both Ramsgate and Dover a number of civi-
lian volunteers came forward to man the boats and to drive
their engines. These men did good work.
112. At both Rams ate and Dover when the business of
manning these civilian power boats was set about the same
difficulties were experienced:-
(i) of obtaining drivers with knowledge of the very
varied types of internal combustion engines;
(ii) of making the engines of these boats run, most of
them having been laid up since the previous summer.
Throughout the operation all engines continued to
give trouble. Many engines were old and almost all were of
different types. Several boats could not be used as they had
diesel engines and no stokers or civilians trained in these
were available. Each engine, especially the older ones,
required careful nursing, and signs of distress from the
engines were not understood. These difficulties were partly
overcome by obtaining engine drivers from Chatham and by the
provision of cadet ratings, and Sub-Lieutenants, R.N.V.R.
from KING ALFRED who claimed knowledge of I.C. engines, but
many engines were of types unknown even to these.
These difficulties would never have arisen had the
civilian crews, or even their drivers, been willing to take
their boats across to Dunkirk.
113. Fresh water for the motor boats was difficult to
supply in sufficient quantity, owing to lack of water tanks
in most boats, especially those of the open type. Large
supplies were required as the troops were reported to be
suffering severely om thirst, Both at Ramsgate and Dover
the Base Staff prov. .ed as many galvanized iron cylinders and
tanks as could be found and made serviceable, and these
proved most satisfactory.
114. On two occasions skoots and small boats approaching
the coast were turned back through false information. On
the first occasion on the afternoon of 28th May, at least 6
skoots, who were without definite orders where to proceed,
encountered a returning shoot when about 10 miles off the
coast. This skoot stated that Dunkirk had already fallen into
German hands and that the evacuation had ceased. It is
believed that this report originated from an Army officer
embarked in the skoot. He had stated, consequent on the
capitulation of Belgian troops that the Germans would be
advancing along the coast that evening. As a result of this
ill-judged comment, the arrival of at least 6 shoots was
delayed at over 24 hours, until this situation had been clear-
ed up.
The second occasion occurred during the night of 1st
June and has been referred to in paragraph 76 of the
narrative. On this occasion although the services of a
number of small craft were lost to the coast, it transpired
that sufficient were already there to cope with the troops
available,
115./