← Document collections
TNA / ADM 199 792

TNA ADM 199 792

TNA ADM 199 792
Collection details

TNA ADM 199 792

Admiralty records concerning Operation Dynamo and the evacuation of troops from Dunkirk, covering 1940–1941.

Holding archive
TNA
Collection reference
ADM 199 792
View the archive catalogue entry ↗

Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 199/792. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Showing only document page 621. Show all matching pages ×

1 matching pages. OCR may contain transcription errors.

List page 1 of 1 Showing document pages 621–621 of this collection
Page ImageOCR textOCR tags
621 Page 621 Log in to enlarge

25th August1940.
ear Guttery, betateq
I am very sorry that your etter T.M. 4324/40 has not yet been inswered. You will remember that it nvited the views of the Admiralty on suggestion that the owners of boats hich helped in the withdrawal from unkirk should be authorised to inscribe n their boats the words "Dunkirk 1940."
his suggestion became part of a big aper in which I had to submit a large umber of proposals for commemorating
Kirk, and this had to go to five embers of the Board including the First ea Lord and First Lord.
gift
It has now come back to me and he decision is that no special recognit or Dunkirk should be approved at presen t any rate, beyond the decorations and wards which have already been published his is in general; in particular there re the following objections to the nscription proposal, namely that
Outtery, Esq., inistry of Shipping
Berkeley Square,
W.1.

No matches

Raw OCR

Unformatted machine-generated OCR for document page 621.

25th August1940.
ear Guttery,
betateq
I am very sorry that your
etter T.M. 4324/40 has not yet been
inswered. You will remember that it
nvited the views of the Admiralty on
suggestion that the owners of boats
hich helped in the withdrawal from
unkirk should be authorised to inscribe
n their boats the words "Dunkirk 1940."
his suggestion became part of a big
aper in which I had to submit a large
umber of proposals for commemorating
Kirk, and this had to go to five
embers of the Board including the First
ea Lord and First Lord.
gift
It has now come back to me and
he decision is that no special recognit
or Dunkirk should be approved at presen
t any rate, beyond the decorations and
wards which have already been published
his is in general; in particular there
re the following objections to the
nscription proposal, namely that
Outtery, Esq.,
inistry of Shipping
Berkeley Square,
W.1.