← Document collections
TNA / ADM 234 360

TNA ADM 234 360

TNA ADM 234 360
Collection details

TNA ADM 234 360

Naval Staff History No. 41, the official historical study of the evacuation from Dunkirk during Operation Dynamo, 26 May–4 June 1940, dated 1949.

Holding archive
TNA
Collection reference
ADM 234 360
View the archive catalogue entry ↗

Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 234/360. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Showing only pages tagged with the vessel name Success. Tags are exact matches from this collection’s OCR tag index. Clear vessel filter ×
Showing only document page 17. Show all matching pages ×

1 matching pages. OCR may contain transcription errors.

List page 1 of 1 Showing document pages 17–17 of this collection
Page ImageOCR textOCR tags
17 Page 17 Log in to enlarge

INTRODUCTION
The Dunkirk evacuation looms large in the history of the war. It involved the dual problem of lifting a mass of hard-pressed troops from a continually shrinking perimeter under uncertain conditions of wind and sea, the menace of heavy attacks by air, and the onrush of a great hostile army; and then of transporting them to England in the face of air attacks, shore bombardments, torpedoes, mines, and the dangers of unlit shoals and wreck-strewn channels.
Despite the heavy losses suffered from all these perils, no less than 239,000
troops were embarked from the shattered quays of a wreck-encumbered harbour; while some 99,000 more were lifted from the 10 miles stretch of shoaling beach north-east of the harbour. This was no light task. The evacuation from the beaches was performed by many hundreds of shallow-draught motor boats, fishing craft, lighters, barges, sailing and pulling boats, manned partly by civilian volunteers - which ferried the weary troops to the destroyers, mine-sweepers, skoots, personnel vessels, tugs and other ships lying off in deeper water.
Operation "Dynamo" was essentially a combined operation, requiring the devoted co-operation of the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force, and the cheerful courage and steadiness of an exhausted Army waiting on the beaches with hardly anything to eat or drink.
It must at once be said that the stupendous success which crowned Operation
"Dynamo," in the face of the determined onslaught of numbers of hostile bombers, could not have been achieved without the air cover provided by
Fighter and Coastal Command, which performed its task almost invariably against superior numbers, and with the serious handicap of having no base nearer than England. In spite of the most strenuous efforts, however, the inadequate numbers of aircraft available precluded the possibility of continuous cover, and it is significant that the losses of ships by air attacks were greater than the aggregate of losses from all other enemy action, while their severity varied proportionately with the strength of our fighter cover at the time.
I The following five naval aircraft squadrons also operated under Coastal Command
801
815
806
Skuas
825
Swordfish
826 Albacore
These aircraft were the only available British dive bombers They carried out attacks on tanks, transport, batteries, gun emplacements, enemy positions in the Calais and Dunkirk areas, and E-boats. In spite of their relative inadequacy for the purpose the Skuas were also detailed for fighter escort for ships. (M.011883/40)
The incidence of losses by enemy action is given in the two following tables xiii

Raw OCR

Unformatted machine-generated OCR for document page 17.

INTRODUCTION
The Dunkirk evacuation looms large in the history of the war. It involved
the dual problem of lifting a mass of hard-pressed troops from a continually
shrinking perimeter under uncertain conditions of wind and sea, the menace of
heavy attacks by air, and the onrush of a great hostile army; and then of
transporting them to England in the face of air attacks, shore bombardments,
torpedoes, mines, and the dangers of unlit shoals and wreck-strewn channels.
Despite the heavy losses suffered from all these perils, no less than 239,000
troops were embarked from the shattered quays of a wreck-encumbered har-
bour ; while some 99,000 more were lifted from the 10 miles stretch of shoaling
beach north-east of the harbour. This was no light task. The evacuation
from the beaches was performed by many hundreds of shallow-draught motor
boats, fishing craft, lighters, barges, sailing and pulling boats, manned partly
by civilian volunteers - which ferried the weary troops to the destroyers,
mine-sweepers, skoots, personnel vessels, tugs and other ships lying off in
deeper water.
Operation "Dynamo" was essentially a combined operation, requiring the
devoted co-operation of the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force, and the
cheerful courage and steadiness of an exhausted Army waiting on the beaches
with hardly anything to eat or drink.
It must at once be said that the stupendous success which crowned Operation
"Dynamo," in the face of the determined onslaught of numbers of hostile
bombers, could not have been achieved without the air cover provided by
Fighter and Coastal Command, which performed its task almost invariably
against superior numbers, and with the serious handicap of having no base
nearer than England. In spite of the most strenuous efforts, however, the
inadequate numbers of aircraft available precluded the possibility of continuous
cover, and it is significant that the losses of ships by air attacks were greater
than the aggregate of losses from all other enemy action, while their severity
varied proportionately with the strength of our fighter cover at the time.
I The following five naval aircraft squadrons also operated under Coastal Command
801
815
806
Skuas
825
Swordfish
826 Albacore
These aircraft were the only available British dive bombers They carried out attacks on
tanks, transport, batteries, gun emplacements, enemy positions in the Calais and Dunkirk
areas, and E-boats. In spite of their relative inadequacy for the purpose the Skuas were
also detailed for fighter escort for ships. (M.011883/40)
The incidence of losses by enemy action is given in the two following tables
xiii