Naval Staff History No. 41, the official historical study of the evacuation from Dunkirk during Operation Dynamo, 26 May–4 June 1940, dated 1949.
Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 234/360. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
1 matching pages. OCR may contain transcription errors.
| Page | Image | OCR text | OCR tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29 |
|
THE WEEK BEFORE OPERATION "DYNAMO" |
Unformatted machine-generated OCR for document page 29.
THE WEEK BEFORE OPERATION "DYNAMO" CHAP. II On the following day (24th May), however, the Prime Minister again con- ferred with M. Reynaud and General Weygand in Paris ; an extract is quoted below from the telegraphic report of this conference which Lord Gort received from the Secretary of State for War : "Both are convinced that Weygand's plan is still capable of execution and only in its execution has [?lies] hope. of restoring the situation. Weygand reports French VII Army is advancing successfully and has captured Péronne, Albert, and Amiens It is essential that you should make every endeavour to co-operate in this plan. Should however, situation on your communications make this at any time impossible you should inform us so that we can inform French and make Naval and Air arrangements to assist you should you have to withdraw on the north coast"¹. Lord Gort says that he fully appreciated the importance of attacking early, before the enemy could bring up his infantry in strength, but facts had to be faced "!. These were some of the facts :- (a) General Weygand's report of the recapture of Péronne, Albert and Amiens was, says Lord Gort, 'inaccurate None of these three towns on the line of the Somme had been recaptured. (b) Two British divisions were still closely engaged with the enemy, and three others were awaiting relief by the French and Belgians, and would not become available for a further 48 hours.¹ (c) Only about 300 rounds per gun were immediately available to the B.E.F., and with communications cut the prospect of further supply was remote.¹ (d) Serious losses in Allied tanks had already been suffered and could not be replaced.¹ (e) The Belgian cavalry was unlikely to be able to engage, at short notice, in a battle 40 miles away, and on French soil.¹ Nevertheless, after consultation with General Blanchard, Lord Gort agreed that in order to implement their share of the Weygand plan they should attack southwards with 2 British divisions, one French division and a French Cavalry Corps. The attack however, could not take place till the 26th May at the earliest, owing to the reliefs in progress and the need to assemble the 2 British divisions which were still closely engaged with the enemy.¹ Furthermore, Lord Gort emphasised, both to the Secretary of State and to General Blanchard, that the principal effort must come from the south, and that the operation of the northern forces could be nothing more than a sortie. It will be seen therefore that the British and the French Governments were both urging a counter offensive on a large scale, barely 48 hours before the Dunkirk evacuation became a desperately urgent necessity. 24TH MAY The Allied position on the canal line was considerably strengthened during the 24th May. On this day also Lord Gort prepared for the proposed counter- attack southwards on the 26th May, with the ultimate objective Plouvain - Marquion - Cambrai. In effect, this attack was never carried out. Fighting troops hold on at Calais In the meantime the evacuation of Boulogne was completed. At Calais evacuation was limited to non-fighting personnel. The fighting troops held on, and a supply ship [the Benlawers]² with stores and transport unloaded for them at Calais. 1 Lord Gort's Second Despatch, para. 38. 2 T.M. 6213/40. 11