Naval Staff History No. 41, the official historical study of the evacuation from Dunkirk during Operation Dynamo, 26 May–4 June 1940, dated 1949.
Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 234/360. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
1 matching pages. OCR may contain transcription errors.
| Page | Image | OCR text | OCR tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| 137 |
|
CHAPTER XII |
Unformatted machine-generated OCR for document page 137.
CHAPTER XII THE FINAL NIGHT, 3RD - - 4TH JUNE Decision to terminate evacuation after night 3rd-4th June (Appendix V) After the last ship quitted Dunkirk at daylight on 3rd June a large number of French troops still remained behind, and it was decided at Dover that the evacuation must continue. There was no certainty that the coming night would see the end of the operation. Admiral Nord stated in a situation report timed 0403 June 3rd, that as enemy attacks were probable during the day the situation concerning munitions might become critical; but the message was much mutilated, and the possibility that exhaustion of ammunition might prevent the continuance of resistance after the night 3rd-4th June was apparently not taken into account at Dover. Vice-Admiral Ramsay, who had no reliable information of the number of French troops still to be evacuated but was aware that the figure was con- siderable and conscious that it was his duty to our Allies to continue evacuation as long as any French troops offered themselves for embarkation, was faced with a situation with which the forces remaining at his disposal might, with the best will in the world, be unable to cope. The operation which had been in progress for the past nine days was of a nature unprecedented in naval warfare, and imposed on the crews of ships engaged an unprecedented strain. Officers and men had not only to cope with the ordinary hazards of the war-such as bombing on an unparalleled scale, frequent shelling, constant working in mined waters, and rescue work under most unpleasant conditions-but were also exposed to the exhaustion pro- duced through having their mess decks and every other available space in their ships constantly crowded with troops. This precluded rest for the watch below, the preparation and enjoyment of proper meals, and such meagre amenities as a small ship operating in face of the enemy could offer. Stokers suffered equally with the seamen because, owing to the physical exhaustion of boats' crews after hours of work, relief crews of stokers were frequently provided from amongst the many who volunteered. Even as early as the 28th May the strain was beginning to tell. Lieutenant P. F. S. Gould, R.N. of M.T.B. 16, working off Bray Beach, reported: "Com- paratively fresh appearance of troops. contrasted increasingly as the evacua- tion progressed with the evidence of strain shown by ship's companies of H.M. ships"¹. Exhaustion was particularly marked in the destroyer force, the remnants of which had been executing a series of round trips without inter- mission for several days. Some of the ships had been working off the coasts of France and the Low Countries for the two weeks preceding the beginning of Operation "Dynamo", engaged on various duties such as evacuating refugees and giving supporting fire to the army and evacuating Boulogne, work which had imposed an intense strain and resulted in heavy losses of ships and men. Vice-Admiral Ramsay consequently represented to the Admiralty that continuance after the night of 3rd-4th June of the demands made by the evacuation would subject a number of officers and men to a test that might be beyond the limit of human endurance, and he requested that fresh forces should be employed if evacuation continued after the coming night, any consequent delay being accepted. I M.011883/40, p.38. E 113