← Document collections
TNA / ADM 234 360

TNA ADM 234 360

TNA ADM 234 360
Collection details

TNA ADM 234 360

Naval Staff History No. 41, the official historical study of the evacuation from Dunkirk during Operation Dynamo, 26 May–4 June 1940, dated 1949.

Holding archive
TNA
Collection reference
ADM 234 360
View the archive catalogue entry ↗

Source: The National Archives, Kew, ADM 234/360. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Showing only document page 151. Show all matching pages ×

1 matching pages. OCR may contain transcription errors.

List page 1 of 1 Showing document pages 151–151 of this collection
Page ImageOCR textOCR tags
151 Page 151 Log in to enlarge

ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATION
CHAP. XIII,
1ST JUNE. Beaches. The climax of boat shortage occurred on this day, and
" increasing enemy air attack caused continual interruptions of embarkation on the beaches and in Dunkirk ' (D.R. P. 25). The disastrous figures reflect the serious situation that developed on the beaches about 2030 on the 31st
May, when the rate of embarkation fell to about 150 an hour owing to shortage of boats.
Harbour. The interruptions caused by air attacks and shelling undoubtedly accounted partly for the poor rate of lift. A further factor was the berthing of destroyers two or three deep at the East Pier. It is true that some destroyers filled up in less than an hour the Vivacious, for example, out of 35 minutes spent in Dunkirk, was alongside the East Pier for only 15 minutes, during which time she took on board 475 men; and the Shikari needed only 20 minutes to embark 623 troops. On the other hand, owing to the state of the tide, the personnel vessel Maid of Orleans spent 51 hours at the East Pier acting as a floating pontoon for destroyers, while the outermost destroyer, the Windsor, spent nearly 15 hours alongside.
2ND JUNE. No daylight evacuations took place after the 1st June, all took place at night.
Beaches. The average lift and waiting time were both much below normal.
There were more ships lying off the beaches than could be loaded by the boats available; consequently, scarcely a single ship left with a full load of troops.
The rate of lift, however, was average.
Harbour. The night of the Ist-2nd June saw the introduction of planned arrival and berthing of ships at Dunkirk. This resulted in a marked improvement in the average lift, which was almost the best of the entire operation.
3RD JUNE. The increase in average time spent at Dunkirk during the night of the 2nd-3rd June over the previous night was probably accounted for by the difficulties experienced by ships in going alongside the East Pier. The figure was worsened by the fact that, owing to the cessation of the flow of
French troops to the East Pier after the embarkation of the British rearguard at 2330 on the 2nd, five destroyers had to be sent back to England practically empty.
4th JUNE. Owing to chaotic conditions in Dunkirk harbour time waiting to berth averaged no less than 100 minutes. Pauses in the flow of French troops to the piers, and the impossibility of inducing them to embark in quick and orderly manner (which latter factor had also operated on the previous night)
sufficed to depress the rate of lift from the high averages of the two previous nights, to the norm for the operation.
Discipline
No instances of naval indiscipline came to light. But in an operation where the level of initiative was very high an unaccountably heavy wastage of small boats occurred from lack of boatkeepers. There were undoubtedly instances where small boats which were brought off from shore to ship manned only by troops, drifted away and were lost after the troops climbed out of them, owing to the omission to put boatkeepers into them.
The state of discipline of the troops had a direct bearing on the rate of embarkation. In the early stages of the operation the troops on the beaches were mainly rear units and indiscipline occurred. The arrival of combatant
127

Raw OCR

Unformatted machine-generated OCR for document page 151.

ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATION
CHAP. XIII,
1ST JUNE. Beaches. The climax of boat shortage occurred on this day, and
" increasing enemy air attack caused continual interruptions of embarkation
on the beaches and in Dunkirk ' (D.R. P. 25). The disastrous figures reflect
the serious situation that developed on the beaches about 2030 on the 31st
May, when the rate of embarkation fell to about 150 an hour owing to shortage
of boats.
Harbour. The interruptions caused by air attacks and shelling undoubtedly
accounted partly for the poor rate of lift. A further factor was the berthing of
destroyers two or three deep at the East Pier. It is true that some destroyers
filled up in less than an hour the Vivacious, for example, out of 35 minutes
spent in Dunkirk, was alongside the East Pier for only 15 minutes, during which
time she took on board 475 men; and the Shikari needed only 20 minutes to
embark 623 troops. On the other hand, owing to the state of the tide, the
personnel vessel Maid of Orleans spent 51 hours at the East Pier acting as a
floating pontoon for destroyers, while the outermost destroyer, the Windsor,
spent nearly 15 hours alongside.
2ND JUNE. No daylight evacuations took place after the 1st June, all took
place at night.
Beaches. The average lift and waiting time were both much below normal.
There were more ships lying off the beaches than could be loaded by the boats
available; consequently, scarcely a single ship left with a full load of troops.
The rate of lift, however, was average.
Harbour. The night of the Ist-2nd June saw the introduction of planned
arrival and berthing of ships at Dunkirk. This resulted in a marked improve-
ment in the average lift, which was almost the best of the entire operation.
3RD JUNE. The increase in average time spent at Dunkirk during the night
of the 2nd-3rd June over the previous night was probably accounted for by
the difficulties experienced by ships in going alongside the East Pier. The
figure was worsened by the fact that, owing to the cessation of the flow of
French troops to the East Pier after the embarkation of the British rear-
guard at 2330 on the 2nd, five destroyers had to be sent back to England
practically empty.
4th JUNE. Owing to chaotic conditions in Dunkirk harbour time waiting to
berth averaged no less than 100 minutes. Pauses in the flow of French troops
to the piers, and the impossibility of inducing them to embark in quick and
orderly manner (which latter factor had also operated on the previous night)
sufficed to depress the rate of lift from the high averages of the two previous
nights, to the norm for the operation.
Discipline
No instances of naval indiscipline came to light. But in an operation where
the level of initiative was very high an unaccountably heavy wastage of small
boats occurred from lack of boatkeepers. There were undoubtedly instances
where small boats which were brought off from shore to ship manned only by
troops, drifted away and were lost after the troops climbed out of them, owing
to the omission to put boatkeepers into them.
The state of discipline of the troops had a direct bearing on the rate of
embarkation. In the early stages of the operation the troops on the beaches
were mainly rear units and indiscipline occurred. The arrival of combatant
127